home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: EUROCONTROL.DE!tur
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.rexx
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; SunOS 4.1.3_U1 sun4)
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- References: <315AD174.466F@interlinx.qc.ca>
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- Message-ID: <315F9291.31DFF4F5@eurocontrol.de>
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 10:23:45 +0200
- Sender: REXX Programming discussion list <REXXLIST@UGA.CC.UGA.EDU>
- From: Cem Turgay <tur@EUROCONTROL.DE>
- Organization: Eurocontrol
- Subject: Re: New Console Interface Definition for Windows95/NT borrowed
- from Amiga
-
- Michael Longval wrote:
- > I remember even better when I bought AREXX for that old Amiga.
- > It was like christmas morning, finding a great gift, that you
- > had never thought of before. Wondering how you go along without
- > it before.
-
- Amiga is back for the future.
- You have a chance again.
-
- > - A least minimal Rexx capabilities, ala ARexx , with posiblities
- > of adding more sophisticated functions with an upgrade. Here
- > I am thinking of a pared down version of Personal Rexx/32 from
- > Quercus.
-
- That's sooo easy to have a Rexx capable CLI window.
- if you have two things, a CLI and a Rexx interpreter.
-
- > Here is a suggestion for the Rexx interpreter:
- >
- > This whole package I would be willing to purchase at about
- > $200.00 U.S. But only if a got most of the above mentionned
- > features.
- >
- > So what do you think?
-
- I realized that I can sell the way of "how anybody can write a
- Rexx interpreter for any shell or CLI" B-)
-
-
- Cem Turgay
-